They have to take the condition of the runway into account when planning landings. The FSX pilot can land in any weather and know that he can stop his aircraft in the normal distance. Perhaps it’s a sad reflection on modern gaming priorities that FSX only models the visual aspect of wet or snowy/icy runway conditions. In out-of-the-box FSX, there are some things you don’t have to think about, which a real–world pilot does: Please do not infer any suggestion of quality or popularity from product’s place in a list. Any lists of add-ons are in alphabetical order.They should not be seen as recommendations. Any references to specific add-ons are for information only.I base my opinions on the knowledge of those who are far more expert than I am. I’m not a real-world pilot, so I’m not claiming any expertise.What I’d like to look at here is where FSX falls short of the realism ideal, and what solutions are available to the virtual pilot who would like to push out the edges of FSX’s realism envelope. Within reason of course this is a hobby, not a second job. For my own purposes, I see “real” as meaning that the kind of things that real-world pilots think about when planning and flying are the kind of things I want to be thinking about as a simmer. If you ask twenty different simmers to define “real”, you’ll get twenty different definitions. We’ve all heard the “As Real as it Gets” phrase used in relation to FSX, but how well does that actually stand up? First we need to define “real”, but “real” means different things to different people.
0 kommentar(er)
